Some Consequences of the Uncertainty in IRT (Item Response Theory) Linking Procedures

Abstract

In many practical applications of item response theory, the parameters of overlapping subsets of test items are estimated from different samples of examinees. A linking procedure is then employed to place the resulting item parameter estimates onto a common scale. It is standard practice to ignore the uncertainty associated with the linking step when drawing inferences that involve items from different subsets, a situation that arises, for example, in the measurement of change. This paper outlines how the uncertainty can be accounted for, and exemplifies the ideas with a jackknife approximation for the Stocking-Lord linking procedure. Examples from the National Assessment of Educational Progress suggest that the resulting uncertainty will usually be negligible for inferences about individuals, but can constitute a major source of estimation error in aggregate statistics such as changes in group means. Keywords: Test methods; Response psychology; Item response theory; Linking transformation; Stocking lord linking procedure.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Jul 01, 1988
Accession Number
ADA197457

Entities

People

  • Kathleen M. Sheehan
  • Robert J. Mislevy

Organizations

  • Educational Testing Service

Tags

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Calibration
  • Classification
  • Cognitive Science
  • Computer Programs
  • Data Science
  • Education
  • Educational Psychology
  • Equations
  • Information Science
  • Measurement
  • Military Research
  • Psychology
  • Security
  • Standards
  • Statistics
  • Students
  • Surveys

Fields of Study

  • Education

Readers

  • Psychometric Testing or Psychological Assessment.
  • Statistical inference.
  • Systems Analysis and Design

Technology Areas

  • AI & ML
  • AI & ML - Bayesian Inference