Is Transformational Leadership Effective in a System Program Office

Abstract

This thesis examines the effectiveness of the leadership styles of government leaders in the weapon systems acquisition community within Air Force Systems Command (AFSC). This study centered on two types of leadership: transactional and transformational leadership. The primary objective was to show that transformational leadership was more effective than transactional leadership. Focusing on the System Program Office these leaders were surveyed to determine leadership characteristics of their directors in addition to the strengths of other mediating variables. These other variables were performance feedback, cohesion, goal clarity, goal difficulty, and support for creativity. A model of leadership was developed illustrating the relationship of leadership, effectiveness, and these mediating variables. Analysis of the survey responses revealed that transformational leadership was significantly more highly correlated with effectiveness that was transactional leadership. The five mediating variables were found to influence effectiveness in differing degrees. Two of the variables were dropped from the model because of multicollinearity involving goal difficulty and a very low coefficient on the variable goal clarity. The final leadership model involved the variables feedback, cohesion, and support for creativity. These variables were related most strongly to effectiveness of the variables studied.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Sep 01, 1988
Accession Number
ADA201467

Entities

People

  • Jeffrey S. Carstens

Organizations

  • Air Force Institute of Technology

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Autonomy
  • Human Systems
  • Space
  • Weapons Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Abstracts
  • Acquisition
  • Air Force
  • Analysis Of Variance
  • Computer Programs
  • Correlation Analysis
  • Data Analysis
  • Human Behavior
  • Leadership
  • Military Education
  • Personality
  • Procurement
  • Students
  • Surveys
  • System Software
  • Systems Management
  • Weapon Systems

Readers

  • Instructional Design and Training Evaluation.
  • Military History of the United States in the 20th Century.
  • Regression Analysis.