Whither the War Correspondent?

Abstract

Relationships between the military, their governments and the media have seldom been completely harmonious, especially when the latter have been reporting, or commenting upon conflict. The problem is multi-faceted because of the disparate and often conflicting needs of each group. The military seek security for their operations; the media seek open access to information; and the government requires secrecy on the one hand, while expecting a sympathetic and supportive media on the other. This study examines these relationships, starting with a historical review of recent small wars in order to identify some of the varied issues that can arise. The impact of the media on public opinion is examined and the study discusses problems of: accreditation; access to, and security of, operational information; information gathering and transmission facilities; censorship and disinformation; the realistic or sanitized coverage of conflict; and the use of 'arm-chair experts' to analyse and predict future military operations. The study considers these problems as they affect the reporting of small wars, and discusses ways in which the potential difficulties may be prevented or at least minimized.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
May 06, 1989
Accession Number
ADA209195

Entities

People

  • Tim L. Porter

Organizations

  • United States Army War College

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Ground and Sea Platforms
  • Human Systems
  • Space
  • Weapons Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Broadcasting
  • Civil War
  • Contingency Operations (Military)
  • Fake News
  • Governments
  • International Relations
  • Military Operations
  • Newspapers
  • Periodicals
  • Photographs
  • Public Opinion
  • Second World War
  • United States
  • Vietnam War
  • War
  • War Colleges
  • Warfare

Readers

  • International Journalism and Media Studies.
  • Military History of the United States in the 20th Century.
  • Systems Analysis and Design