A Middle-Range Response: The Need for Motorized Forces

Abstract

The Secretary of Defense stated: The overall goal of our force projection program is to achieve an ability to deploy adequate forces to counter simultaneous Soviet-bloc offensives in Europe, the Pacific region, and Southwest Asia (SWA). The United States Army is charged with responding to a variety of threats across the entire spectrum of conflict. While forces are available to meet the low and high intensity threat, few forces are structured to respond to the increasing threat in the middle of the spectrum. This paper analyzes the growing armor threat in the third world, assesses U.S. forces ability to respond in terms of structure, availability, strengths and weaknesses, and offers motorization as an alternative to meet the mid-intensity threat. With the recent Army Chief of Staff decision to delete the motorized concept for the Active Components, a candidate could be Reserve Component Forces using off-the-shelf equipment and realistic missions. Regardless of what component is selected, this nation must have forces available and properly structured to respond to threats in the middle of the conflict spectrum. An alternative is motorization.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Mar 31, 1989
Accession Number
ADA209566

Entities

People

  • Michael J. Dolan Iii

Organizations

  • United States Army War College

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Human Systems
  • Weapons Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Abstracts
  • Armored Personnel Carriers
  • Armored Vehicles
  • Army
  • Classification
  • Contingency Operations (Military)
  • Force Structure
  • Indirect Fire
  • Light Armored Vehicles
  • National Guard
  • Survivability
  • Tracked Vehicles
  • United States
  • Vehicles
  • War Colleges
  • Warfare
  • Weapons

Readers

  • East Asian Political and Security Studies within the Soviet Union
  • Joint Military Operations and Doctrine.
  • Military Science