Can the Army Support the Light Division

Abstract

In 1980, after years of designing larger and heavier divisions, to meet the soviet threat in Central Europe, the Army Leadership identified the requirement for a better balanced force. The need for a flexible response capability was the basis for today's light infantry division (LID). In 1985 the light division became a reality and, with it, the Army provided the National Command Authority the option of tailoring a force that could rapidly reinforce our forward deployed forces or, by maximizing its strategic mobility, deal with contingencies in less mature theaters. The light division was designed to be no larger than 10,000 soldiers and capable of deploying in 500 C141B sorties. The combat service support (CSS) structure of the LID is unique and extremely light. To sustain itself beyond 48 hours, the light division requires specific corps- level augmentation and an increased amount of direct support. This paper addresses the strategic role and operational employment of the LID and examines the logistics concepts, CSS structure, and details the requirement for corps augmentation. It will make some assessments based on the LID certification exercise, the introduction of the multifunctional corps support group concept and ongoing force structure changes. Also, it will provide recommendations for enhancement of the LID's CSS capability when used in a contingency force role and alignment of corps combat service support elements.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Mar 15, 1989
Accession Number
ADA210985

Entities

People

  • David H. Wayne

Organizations

  • United States Army War College

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Biomedical
  • Human Systems
  • Weapons Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Combat Forces
  • Command And Control
  • Contingency Operations (Military)
  • Conventional Warfare
  • Deployment
  • Employment
  • Force Structure
  • Logistics
  • Maintenance
  • Medical Evacuation
  • Military Organizations
  • National Security
  • Organizational Structure
  • Security
  • United States
  • War Colleges
  • Warfare

Readers

  • Joint Military Operations and Doctrine.
  • Military Science
  • Military Training and Readiness Simulation