Discriminating Rigid from Nonrigid Motion

Abstract

Theoretical investigations of structure from motion have demonstrated that an ideal observer can discriminate rigid from nonrigid motion from two views of as few as four points. We report three experiments that demonstrate similar abilities in human observers: In one experiment 4 of 6 subjects made this discrimination from two views of four points; the remaining subjects required five points. Accuracy in discriminating rigid from nonrigid motion depended on the amount of nonrigidity in the nonrigid structure. Our measure on nonrigidity was based on the variance of the interpoint distances over views. The ability to detect a rigid group dropped sharply as 'noise' points (points not part of the rigid group) were added to the display. We conclude that human observers do extremely well in discriminating between nonrigid and fully rigid motion, but do quite poorly at segregating points in a display on the basis of rigidity.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Jul 31, 1989
Accession Number
ADA211794

Entities

People

  • Donald D. Hoffman
  • Frank E. Pollick
  • Myron L. Braunstein

Organizations

  • University of California, Irvine

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Air Platforms
  • Biomedical
  • Ground and Sea Platforms
  • Human Systems
  • Weapons Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Accuracy
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Classification
  • Cognitive Science
  • Computer Science
  • Information Processing
  • Information Science
  • Military Research
  • Observers
  • Perception
  • Psychology
  • Signal Detection
  • Social Sciences
  • Statistical Analysis
  • Students
  • Three Dimensional
  • Two Dimensional

Readers

  • Electromagnetic Wave Scattering and Antenna Radiation Engineering
  • Mathematics or Statistics
  • Vision Science/Vision Psychology/Cognitive Neuroscience.