Dimensional Analysis of the Quantified Judgement Model

Abstract

Quantitative analysis, specifically in this thesis which studies the Quantified Judgement Model (QJM), has been used consistently as a method of analyzing ground combat. If the QJM model is to be used as a basis for making important ground combat decisions, then its internal mathematical consistency and military soundness must be firmly established. A universal requirement is that any model be both reasonable and valid, in which case the model itself must be able to withstand careful scrutiny. In the case of the QJM, a dimensional analysis to ensure mathematical consistency of the variables and submodels is one test of the reasonableness of the model. Dimensional analysis tests are applied in this thesis to examine the validity of the QJM. We also perform some analyses to determine how sensitive the outcomes predicted by the model are to the values of several of the coefficients appearing in its submodels. Keywords: Dimensional, Qualified judgement model, Ground combat, Deputy, Force strength, Theses.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Jun 01, 1989
Accession Number
ADA212059

Entities

People

  • Jerome A. Clark

Organizations

  • Naval Postgraduate School

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Energy and Power Technologies
  • Weapons Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Accuracy
  • Ammunition
  • Armored Vehicles
  • Artillery
  • Combat Effectiveness
  • Consistency
  • Equations
  • Firing Rate
  • Judgment
  • Mathematical Models
  • Models
  • Operations Research
  • Reliability
  • United States Naval Academy
  • Vehicles
  • Warfare
  • Weapons

Readers

  • Computational Modeling and Simulation
  • Military History / Militaries and War Studies