Optimizing the Post-START (Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty) U.S. Strategic Nuclear Force Mix

Abstract

This thesis examines the impact a START agreement might have on the United States and Soviet strategic nuclear forces. It then proposes an optimum post-START force mix for the United States and the Soviet Union. The current, as well as projected, post-START targeting policies are discussed. It is concluded that the impact of a START agreement on the current U.S. strategic targeting policy will be minimal. Although the target data base will not shrink as much as the forces tasked to cover it, a prioritization of targets is all that should be necessary with a post-START force. A START agreement will mean major reductions in U.S. and Soviet strategic nuclear forces. As proposed in this thesis, only the ICBM leg of the Traid will require any major re-structuring. This would include the addition of mobile ICBM systems. The SLBM and bomber legs will feel minimal changes (i.e., retiring POSEIDON SSBNs and retiring or converting some older B-52s). It is recommended that the B-52 program be cancelled, and funding be re-directed into mobile ICBM systems. By doing so the United States could utilize technology available today to strengthen its forces and not gamble on the low-observable technology which a stealth bomber might have.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Jun 01, 1989
Accession Number
ADA212148

Entities

People

  • David A. Leary

Organizations

  • Naval Postgraduate School

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Air Platforms
  • Ground and Sea Platforms
  • Space
  • Weapons Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Agreements
  • Air Defense
  • Ballistic Missiles
  • Command And Control
  • Databases
  • Defense Systems
  • Fleet Ballistic Missiles
  • Force Structure
  • Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles
  • Military Organizations
  • National Security
  • Navigation
  • Stealth Technology
  • Strategic Weapons
  • United States
  • Ussr
  • Weapons Effects

Readers

  • Military Logistics and Supply Chain Management
  • Military Mobilization and Reserve Forces Studies.
  • Missile Defense Systems.