The Debate Over International Armament Programs: Integrating Current Knowledge and the FSX Case
Abstract
This theses developed a framework within which future international armament programs can be evaluated, negotiated, and managed. International armament programs are gaining importance. Global interdependence, skyrocketing weapons costs, and increasingly capable allies make for a great opportunity to employ international programs. However, a fragile industrial base, global competition, and huge trade deficits also make international programs risky for the United States. Consequently, future international armament programs will demand expert and enlightened management. Those involved must be well-versed in the potential benefits as well as the risks of U.S. participation in international programs. This research provides a solid foundation for the policy maker or the program manager. A comprehensive approach has been taken with existing literature on international armament programs. A case study of a current international program was conducted. Through analysis of the FSX agreement between the U.S. and Japan, the framework was refined to reflect issues arising out of the current economic, political, and military balances in the world. The resulting framework provides a tool for those involved in the evaluation, negotiation, and management of future international armament programs. By encompassing the major issues involved in today's international arrangements, the framework can be used not only to educate, but also to guide. (JHD)
Document Details
- Document Type
- Technical Report
- Publication Date
- Sep 01, 1989
- Accession Number
- ADA216344
Entities
People
- Thomas P. Griffin
Organizations
- Air Force Institute of Technology