Game-Structured Analysis as a Framework for Defense Planning

Abstract

Concepts and techniques are now emerging that could be a unifying influence for strategic analysis of NATO issues. These will make possible multiscenario analysis and the development and testing (through simulation) of complex strategies incorporating a diversity of ideas and capabilities, and reflecting recognition that operational strategy should be adaptive and multifaceted. It is possible that greater consensus will develop within the several analytic and strategic communities, and that this is in turn will influence policy. The author believes that a way to start would involve a NATO- wide professional association, with NATO sanction, that would seek to bring together special groups with the purpose of improving prospects for modeler- analysts (working at varied levels of detail), technologists, and strategies being able to speak in a common language and calibrate their assumptions. Subsequently, it would be useful to compare multiscenario balance assessments-- with the objective of seeing whether agreement can be reached on the complex strategies and sets of capabilities needed by NATO in the face of continuing threat and uncertainty. (edc)

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Mar 01, 1988
Accession Number
ADA216633

Entities

People

  • Paul K. Davis

Organizations

  • RAND Corporation

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • C4I
  • Counter WMD
  • Weapons Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Air Force
  • Attrition
  • Combat Simulations
  • Computer Languages
  • Computers
  • Contingency Operations (Military)
  • Defense Planning
  • Department Of Defense
  • Employment
  • Game Theory
  • Military Organizations
  • Military Strategy
  • Strategic Analysis
  • United States
  • Urban Areas
  • War Games
  • Warfare

Readers

  • International Relations and Conflict Resolution
  • Systems Analysis and Design