Exploiting Technology: Presentation to a Colloquium of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, 29 September 1987

Abstract

Technology cannot enhance the security of the United States unless it is exploited. The point is obvious. However, it seems in this case that restating the obvious is appropriate. With respect to conventional weapons, we are not exploiting emerged technology in time constants that could remotely be characterized as timely. Progress toward operational capability does not stem from projects that study phenomenology. Progress stems from programs with an operational focus. In the case of weapons this means we are specific--we are equipping some platform with some weapon to kill something according to a well- defined operational concept. It is currently too easy to set up dead-end technology projects and too hard to sustain meaningful development programs. Somehow or another we must reverse these circumstances. We should advocate weapons in a larger context. We should pursue weapons in the context of an overall building--the operational capability we seek is the building. By the same token, operational capability is attained by the thoughtful integration of engagement systems, weapons, and munitions, with delivery platforms. (jhd)

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Jan 01, 1988
Accession Number
ADA216915

Entities

People

  • Gleen A. Kent

Organizations

  • RAND Corporation

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Weapons Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Air Force
  • Airborne Warning And Control System
  • Aircrafts
  • Combatant Commanders
  • Contractors
  • Control Systems
  • Cruise Missiles
  • Data Links
  • Detectors
  • Laser Radar
  • Munitions
  • Navigation
  • Precision-Guided Munitions
  • Radar
  • United States
  • Vehicles
  • Weapons

Readers

  • Academic Conference Management
  • Military Science and Technology Research and Modernization.
  • Systems Analysis and Design