Tower-Noticing Triggers Strategy-Change in the Tower of Hanoi: A Soar Model

Abstract

People who solve the Tower of Hanoi start out with a guided trial- and-error strategy and later acquire a recursive strategy, the generally most effective strategy. Protocol data shows that noticing and using subtowers in problem-solving differentiates two subjects who acquired the recursive strategy from one who did not. A working Soar model explains Tower of Hanoi strategy- acquisition by first assuming the basic ability to notice and use subtowers, and then charting the process by which this new knowledge is integrated with existing knowledge to produce the recursive strategy. Of particular importance in the integration is learning to see nested subtowers and using simple spatial- manipulation reasoning to figure out how to move those subtowers. The model shows a good qualitative fit to the data, providing support for Soar as a unified theory of human cognition. (kr)

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Jun 01, 1989
Accession Number
ADA218927

Entities

People

  • Allen Newell
  • Dirk Ruiz

Organizations

  • Carnegie Mellon University

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Energy and Power Technologies
  • Materials and Manufacturing Processes

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Acquisition
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Classification
  • Cognition
  • Cognitive Science
  • Computer Science
  • Computers
  • Learning
  • Military Research
  • New Jersey
  • Procurement
  • Production
  • Psychology
  • Reasoning
  • Security
  • United States
  • United States Government

Readers

  • Artificial Intelligence