North Atlantic Treaty Organization's Collective Defense Effort: The Burdensharing Controversy

Abstract

The paper is an analytical study of an issue which could severely disturb the cohesion of NATO. Burdensharing can be regarded as one of the fundamental principles of an alliance consisting of sovereign states. The members of NATO repeatedly declared their willingness to share the risks, costs, and responsibilities as well as the benefits of the common defense. In the U.S. many people believe that the European Allies share an insufficient part of the common defense burden. In fact, this perception is true if burdensharing would be only a matter of comparing financial contributions. However there are several other factors which are also analyzed and assessed. Despite the current controversy it should be emphasized that the basic common interest of NATO to counter the Warsaw Pact's military threat has not changed. The security and prosperity of Europe and North America still depends--and will depend--on a strong NATO. However, burdensharing is a prerequisite for maintaining solidarity and cohesion within NATO. Therefore, the recommendations offer at least a partial solution of the controversy. (eg)

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
May 01, 1989
Accession Number
ADA220618

Entities

People

  • Wolfgang Von Kirschbaum

Organizations

  • Air War College

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • C4I
  • Human Systems
  • Space
  • Weapons Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Air Force
  • Command And Control
  • Defense Planning
  • Foreign Aid
  • Geography
  • Governments
  • International Law
  • International Relations
  • Investments
  • Military Budgets
  • Military Organizations
  • National Security
  • Nato
  • North America
  • Treaties
  • United States
  • War Colleges

Readers

  • International Relations and European Studies
  • Strategic Security Studies