Is Organization the Synchronization Problem? Battle Staff Organization of the Heavy Task Force

Abstract

This monograph explores both U.S. Army and Israeli Defense Force battalion level, battle staff doctrine within the framework of the battlefield operating systems. The principle research question is 'What is the optimum battle staff organization to synchronize combat operations within the heavy task force?' Lessons learned at the National Training Center indicate U.S. heavy battalions have difficulty synchronizing the battlefield operating systems. Command and control (C2) is a key component of the synchronization process. The exercise of C2 in the battalion task force is focused in four major command posts (CPs) - the tactical CP, the main CP, the combat trains CP, and the field trains CP. Israel's battalion staff doctrine is significantly different from our own and recent combat experience tempers their outlook. They fight with different C2 nodes and they train and use their officers differently. Keywords: Battle group level organizations; Defense systems; Israelis; Military forces(Foreign); Military forces(United States); Battalion level organizations.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Mar 26, 1990
Accession Number
ADA225450

Entities

People

  • Michael R. Thompson

Organizations

  • United States Army Command and General Staff College

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Biomedical
  • C4I
  • Weapons Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Air Defense
  • Air Force
  • Artillery
  • Combat Forces
  • Combat Operations
  • Combat Support
  • Command And Control
  • Contingency Operations (Military)
  • Employment
  • Fire Support
  • Lessons Learned
  • Organizational Structure
  • Personnel Management
  • Students
  • United States
  • War Colleges
  • Warfare

Readers

  • Military History / Militaries and War Studies
  • Military Science

Technology Areas

  • Fully Networked C3
  • Fully Networked C3 - Command and Control