In Search of a Combat Theory: the Tactical Utility of TMCI's Military Combat Theory

Abstract

What is the relevance of the Military Conflict Institute's (TMCI's) new military combat theory for the tactical commander? The answer to this question highlights the long debate over the role of science and art in the commander's estimate, a debate which the Soviets have answered with 'all science' and the U.S. with 'all art'. If the end objective of theory and doctrine is to generate combat power then TMCI's integrated approach of art AND science functions more usefully for the commander than does current U.S. tactical doctrine. TMCI's proposed model shows the commander the components and linkages of combat whereas current U.S. doctrine chiefly supplies a listing of imperatives with questionable utility. By grouping combat variables and analyzing their interaction TMCI both quantifies important combat intangibles and reduces the number of variables with which a commander must deal. Freed from the overwhelming immensity of combat unknowns, the commander is actually freer to practice his 'art', and in a more informed way. (cp)

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Nov 27, 1989
Accession Number
ADA225469

Entities

People

  • James A. Muhl Jr

Organizations

  • United States Army Command and General Staff College

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Biomedical
  • C4I
  • Energy and Power Technologies
  • Weapons Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Attrition
  • Construction
  • Doctrine
  • Education
  • Military Doctrine
  • Military Science
  • New York
  • Personality
  • Physical Properties
  • Psychological Warfare
  • Resilience
  • Security
  • Simulations
  • Students
  • Training
  • Warfare
  • Weapons

Readers

  • Forest Ecology
  • Military History / Militaries and War Studies
  • Systems Analysis and Design