Investigating Individual Differences in General Comprehension Skill: The Role of Suppression and Enhancement

Abstract

Investigation into whether the cognitive mechanism of suppression underlies differences in adult comprehensions skills are reported. Less-skilled comprehenders less-efficiently reject the inappropriate meaning of ambiguous words (e.g., the playing card vs garden tool meaning of spade), the incorrect forms of homophones (e.g., patients vs patience), the highly-typical-but-absent members of scenes (e.g., tractor in a farm scene), and words superimposed on pictures of pictures surrounding words. however, less-skilled comprehenders are not less cognizant of what is contexually appropriate, in fact, they benefit from a biasing context just as much (and perhaps more) as more-skilled comprehenders do. So, comprehenders do no have difficulty enhancing contexually appropriate information. Instead, it is suggested that less-skilled comprehenders suffer from less-efficient suppression mechanism, which we conclude is an important component of general comprehension skill.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Aug 01, 1990
Accession Number
ADA226788

Entities

People

  • Morton A. Gernsbacher

Organizations

  • University of Oregon

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Biomedical

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Air Force
  • Air Force Facilities
  • Biological Sciences
  • Cognition
  • Contrast
  • Identification
  • Language
  • Materials
  • New York
  • Notation
  • Perception
  • Psychology
  • Reaction Time
  • Recognition
  • Standards
  • Students
  • Word Recognition

Readers

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Educational Psychology
  • Materials Science and Engineering.