Operational Interdiction: An Appraisal of United States Interdiction Doctrine for the Operational Level of War

Abstract

This study investigates past and current US Army and US Air Force doctrine and proposed joint doctrine for interdiction operations at the operational level of war. The investigation assesses the post-Korean Conflict role of interdiction, analyzes the current status of interdiction, and evaluates the consistency, compatibility, and conformity of current US Army, US Air Force, and proposed joint interdiction doctrine. The study concludes that the United States does not have a coherent interdiction doctrine for the operational level of warfare. Discrepancies were discovered between US Army, US Air Force, and proposed joint interdiction doctrine. They range from use of non-standard terminology to lack of recognition of an operational level of warfare. The study recommends that a standard terminology be adopted,

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Jun 01, 1990
Accession Number
ADA227382

Entities

People

  • James W. Ewing Jr.

Organizations

  • United States Army Command and General Staff College

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Counter WMD
  • Energy and Power Technologies
  • Space
  • Weapons Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Air Force
  • Air Power
  • Combat Areas
  • Contingency Operations (Military)
  • Doctrine
  • Fire Support
  • Geographic Regions
  • Lessons Learned
  • Military History
  • Military Operations
  • Military Organizations
  • Reconnaissance
  • Tactical Air Support
  • United States
  • United States European Command
  • War Colleges
  • Warfare

Readers

  • Joint Military Operations and Doctrine.
  • Theoretical Analysis.