Economic Analysis of Coal-Fired Cogeneration Plants for Air Force Bases

Abstract

The Defense Appropriations Act of 1986 requires the Department of Defense to use an additional 1,600,000 tons/year of coal at their U.S. facilities by 1995 and also states that the most economical fuel should be used at each facility. In a previous study of Air Force heating plants burning gas or oil, Oak Ridge National Laboratory found that only a small fraction of this target 1,600,000 tons/year could be achieved by converting the plants where coal is economically viable. To identify projects that would use greater amounts of coal, the economic benefits of installing coal-fired cogeneration plants at 7 candidate Air Force bases were examined in this study. A life-cycle cost analysis was performed that included two types of financing (Air Force and private) and three levels of energy escalation for a total of six economic scenarios. Hill, McGuire, and Plattsburgh Air Force Bases were identified as the facilities with the best potential for coal-fired cogeneration, but the actual cost savings will depend strongly on how the projects are financed and to a lesser extent of future energy escalation rates.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Oct 01, 1990
Accession Number
ADA227646

Entities

People

  • Frederick P. Griffin
  • Robert S. Holcomb

Organizations

  • Oak Ridge National Laboratory

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Energy and Power Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Air Force
  • Air Force Facilities
  • Calorific Value
  • Computers
  • Contracts
  • Cost Analysis
  • Cost Estimates
  • Economic Analysis
  • Economics
  • Electrical Equipment
  • Energy Systems
  • Engineering
  • Heating Plants
  • Life Cycle Costs
  • Life Cycles
  • United States
  • United States Government

Fields of Study

  • Environmental science

Readers

  • Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) of Proposed Air Force Base Actions.
  • Internal Combustion Engine (ICE) Technology.
  • Life Cycle Cost Analysis