Interview Testing as a Work Sample Measure of Job Proficiency

Abstract

The development of criteria to measure individual proficiency is a necessary prerequisite for most personnel decisions. As part of the Air Force's Job Performance Measurement project, performance measures were developed and administered to more than 1400 enlisted airmen across eight Air Force specialties (AFSs). Included in these measures were two work sample tests (i.e., hands-on, interview), four rating forms of varying specificity, and job knowledge tests. The current research effort centers on Interview Testing as an alternative to the more costly and time-consuming Hands-on Testing. Data analyses revealed that correlations between the two work sample tests ranged from moderate (.46) to high (.84) across the eight AFSs. Also, the patterns of relationships between each work sample test and the series of related measures were quite similar. These results suggest that the interview approach of this approach for performance measurement, validation of selection/classification procedures. evaluating training programs, and identifying training deficiencies. (Author) (emk)

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Nov 01, 1990
Accession Number
ADA228054

Entities

People

  • Frances J. Laue
  • Jerry W. Hedge
  • Mark S. Teachout

Organizations

  • Universal Energy Systems

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Human Systems

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Air Force
  • Applied Psychology
  • Classification
  • Data Analysis
  • Descriptive Analytics
  • Enlisted Personnel
  • Human Resources
  • Management Personnel
  • Measurement
  • Performance Tests
  • Personnel Management
  • Personnel Selection
  • Psychology
  • Ratings
  • Standards
  • Test And Evaluation
  • Training

Fields of Study

  • Education

Readers

  • Occupational Health and Safety.
  • Psychometric Testing or Psychological Assessment.