On Biomedical Research Policy in the Future

Abstract

The pressure to control federal deficits seems certain to continue well into the 1990s, which means tight biomedical research budgets. Many proposals with scientific merit are likely to remain unfunded, the competition for existing funds will increase, and the search for new funding sources will become more intense. Although progress has been made in the control of health care costs over the past several years, the problem is going to persist, and it may adversely affect biomedical research funding, independent of the general pressure it places on the federal budget. Advances in medical science often involve expensive new technologies and some believe that one way to control costs is for the government to spend less on biomedical research. New payment systems, such as the Medicare Prospective Payment System (PPS), capitated payment plans,and preferred provider organizations, provide disincentives for the use of expensive new diagnostic and treatment modalities, unless they are cost-saving. Of course, there are some safeguards in these systems against inappropriate rationing of new technology, but it is difficult to design features that will discourage only wasteful use without use without also discouraging some beneficial use.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Jan 01, 1989
Accession Number
ADA228270

Entities

People

  • Albert P. Williams

Organizations

  • RAND Corporation

Tags

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Biomedical Research
  • Budgets
  • Corporations
  • Education
  • Federal Budgets
  • Governments
  • Health
  • Health Care
  • Health Services
  • Hospitals
  • Motivation
  • National Governments
  • Public Health
  • Public Policy
  • Task Forces
  • United States
  • United States Government

Fields of Study

  • Medicine
  • Political science

Readers

  • Economics
  • Medical or Health Care Field.
  • Systems Analysis and Design

Technology Areas

  • Biotechnology