Representations in Mental Models

Abstract

On March 12-13 an interdisciplinary group of thirty-five, composed of computer scientists, experimental psychologists, linguists, philosophers and connectionists met to share views on representations and their role in mental models. Although at least two books and several papers directly address these issues, the nature of mental models is far from clear. The meeting shed some light on why understanding mental models is difficult. Simply, put, the reason is that mental processes are described in many different ways and a quite different levels of abstraction, depending upon the researcher. For example, some emphasize the cognitive properties of mental models, whereas others are more concerned with the internal data structures. Still others may stress the logical form and content of the mental process, as constrasted with the actual computational machinery. The diversity of these viewpoints is clear upon reading the abstracts prepared by the participants. Further study is needed to examine how these diverse viewpoints fit together into a useful, integrated framework. (KR)

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Sep 01, 1990
Accession Number
ADA229401

Entities

People

  • Whitman Richards

Organizations

  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • C4I
  • Space

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Air Force
  • Classification
  • Cognition
  • Cognitive Science
  • Computer Science
  • Computers
  • Language
  • Linguistics
  • Mental Processes
  • Object Recognition
  • Perception
  • Plastic Explosives
  • Psychology
  • Reasoning
  • Recognition
  • Security
  • Spectra

Readers

  • Academic Conference Management
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Theoretical Analysis.