A Comparison of Inventory Safety Stock Calculation Methods for the Air Force Commissary Service

Abstract

This study examined alternative methods of computing safety stock in the commissary operating environment. Safety stock calculation methods designed to deliver a predetermined level of customer service were the primary area of concentration. AFCOMS provided the data for this research, which was from the Randolph AFB commissary store. Current safety stock levels constituted the baseline for this study. Another method, recommended by Bytronic Technologies Corporation, was also tested. A regression model was built to relate customer service level Not-In-Stock Rate/NIS to measure of buffer stock and demand variability . A Slam II simulation model of a commissary store inventory system was used to test the performance of each technique. It was determined that none of the methods was clearly superior to the others. Baseline safety stock levels are set too low to attain AFCOMS' goal of a two percent NIS rate. The targeted service level methods over-allocated safety stock to all but the high demand items. NIS rates of other than high demand items were consistently below the target level. The Bytronic method performed well with high variability items, but was ineffective with other items.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Sep 01, 1990
Accession Number
ADA229579

Entities

People

  • Robert A. Stead

Organizations

  • Air Force Institute of Technology

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Human Systems

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Accuracy
  • Air Force
  • Control Systems
  • Corporations
  • Customer Services
  • Inventory
  • Inventory Control
  • Investments
  • Lead Time
  • Logistics
  • Logistics Management
  • Negative Impedance Converters
  • Operations Research
  • Plastic Explosives
  • Simulations
  • Standards
  • Statistics

Readers

  • Computational Modeling and Simulation
  • Logistics and Supply Chain Management.