Relationships between Mobility, Sustainability, and Firepower

Abstract

Force structure planning for the future will include assessment of unit deployability. This study addresses the issue of deploying heavy units versus deploying light units. It shows that when additional criteria of sustainability and firepower are considered, the time differences to deploy a sustainable force and the capabilities of the possible forces argue persuasively for heavier units. The study shows that the comparisons that have to be made center on the issue of mode availability. Light divisions can be deployed more quickly by air than can heavy divisions. But only under limited circumstances do divisions deploy alone; they always require varying degrees of support, and other service requirements usually will claim some of the available airlift. The study illustrates that when the amount of cargo to be moved by the available airlift takes longer than the time required to open a sea line of communication, the primary airlift advantage disappears. If sealift must be used to complete a deployment, then heavy units are the preferred choice because of their greater firepower and survivability. This analysis supports the retention of heavy divisions in the force structure despite their 'apparent' deployability disadvantage.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Feb 01, 1991
Accession Number
ADA233052

Entities

People

  • Frederick M. Mcnamee
  • Michael D. Mcmanus

Organizations

  • LMI

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Ground and Sea Platforms
  • Human Systems

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Air Force
  • Aircrafts
  • Armored Vehicles
  • Availability
  • Combat Forces
  • Department Of Defense
  • Deployment
  • Force Structure
  • Lessons Learned
  • Logistics
  • Logistics Management
  • Middle East
  • Mobility
  • Passenger Aircraft
  • Rate Of Consumption
  • United States
  • Warfare

Readers

  • Aerospace logistics and air mobility.
  • Educational Psychology
  • Maritime Combat Support and Expeditionary Logistics.