A New Paradigm for Understanding Nuclear Strategy

Abstract

With the end of the Cold War as we have known it since the late 1940s and the apparent success of U.S. containment policy, old, familiar questions demand answers in a new and unfamiliar context. The Cold War is over but the Nuclear Age is not; nuclear weapons cannot be disinvented. Collapse of the Warsaw Pact and dramatic reduction of tensions between the United States and the USSR compel re-examination of fundamental strategy issues. What is the purpose of nuclear weapons? How should we plan for their use? What kinds of weapons and delivery systems should we develop and deploy? How many should we have? Why have any? This essay does not seek to provide a comprehensive review of nuclear strategy since 1945, nor does it provide detailed recommendations for future strategy. Rather, it introduces a new paradigm, a new structure, a new set of lenses, which permits the strategist to seek old familiar information in a different context. Taking strategy to include ends, ways, and means, the new paradigm introduced herein interprets the past 45 years as three discernible time periods, each with a different characteristic.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Apr 04, 1991
Accession Number
ADA234225

Entities

People

  • Joe C. Dixon

Organizations

  • United States Army War College

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Counter WMD
  • Space
  • Weapons Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Air Force
  • Arms Control
  • Ballistic Missiles
  • Eastern Europe
  • Europe
  • Foreign Relations
  • Fusion Weapons
  • Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles
  • Military Strategy
  • National Politics
  • National Security
  • Negotiations
  • Nuclear Weapons
  • Schools
  • Treaties
  • United States
  • War Colleges

Readers

  • Military History / Militaries and War Studies
  • Nuclear Non-Proliferation and International Security
  • Theoretical Analysis.