Defense Communications: Millions May be Spent Unnecessarily to Expand Data Network

Abstract

The Department of Defense's current approach to providing long distance data communications-using a single network design to meet heterogeneous user requirements-may not be cost effective. Moreover, the impact that FTS2000 will have on this approach is currently unknown. As a result, Defense plans to spend millions of dollars to build on this current approach need to be reassessed. This approach is based on the assumption that economies of scale can be achieved if all Defense systems are mandated to use a single network. However, this assumption is not based on a current analysis showing that this is the most cost effective way to proceed in today's communications environment, and in fact some evidence exists to the contrary. For example, DCA data shows that less costly alternatives exist for some Defense users. Further, expensive modifications will be needed to achieve compatibility between DDN and some users' systems. Finally, the advent of FTS 2000 will probably cut into DDN'S current and future user base. While we recognize that mandating a single network may have been appropriate 8 years ago when few communication alternatives were available, today more options are available to meet the individual needs of Defense users-options which may be more cost effective.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Nov 07, 1990
Accession Number
ADA235160

Entities

Organizations

  • United States Government Accountability Office

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • C4I

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Air Force
  • Command And Control
  • Command And Control Systems
  • Communication Channels
  • Communication Systems
  • Computer Network Security
  • Control Systems
  • Cost Effectiveness
  • Defense Systems
  • Department Of Defense
  • Digital Communications
  • Economic Analysis
  • Governments
  • Information Systems
  • Money
  • Packet Switching
  • Standards

Readers

  • Computer Networking
  • Defense Acquisition Program Management
  • Tactical Satellite Communications Systems Engineering.