A Comparison of Manual Scaled and Predicted foE and foF1 Critical Frequencies

Abstract

The CCIR and Titheridge for critical frequency prediction routines were tested by comparison with 1875 manually scaled values. The foF1 critical frequency prediction routine of Millman et al was tested by comparison with 1005 manually scaled values. Plots and statistics of the comparisons are presented and discussed. From the results recommendations are made to help improve autoscaling.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Jul 01, 1990
Accession Number
ADA235551

Entities

People

  • Robert R. Gamache
  • William T. Kersey

Tags

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Abstracts
  • Air Force
  • Air Force Facilities
  • Availability
  • Buildings And Structures
  • Classification
  • Data Sets
  • Databases
  • Equations
  • Frequency
  • Ionograms
  • Massachusetts
  • Measurement
  • Security
  • Statistics
  • Technical Information Centers
  • United States

Fields of Study

  • Psychology

Readers

  • Computational Modeling and Simulation
  • Computer Science.
  • Space/Atmospheric Physics.