Agility versus Endurance in Airland Battle-Future: A High-Risk Trade-Off
Abstract
The monograph examines the assumptions and conclusions of the ALB-F operational concept and its implications for a proposed tactical force structure. These conclusions are concentrated with alternative views of future war and battle conditions developed by other military analysts. The alternatives are used to gauge the possible range of conditions our future force structure must accommodate. A cardinal element in our future force design is a desire to increase agility through reduction in force size and complexity. The paper examines the nature of agility and the impact of proposed force structure modifications on a unit's combat power and endurance. The Wass de Czege combat Power Model is used to analyze the systemic impact of proposed changes to U.S. force structure by comparing and contrasting alternative potential unit structures. Finally, the monograph concludes that our uncertain view of the future requires greater caution and flexibility in the force structure we select. It points out that our lack of understanding of the physical trait of agility has led to the flawed methodology used to develop the proposed ALB-F unit structures. The paper recommends a more systemic evaluation for the measurement of potential combat power, unit agility, and the contribution of logistics assets to these traits.
Document Details
- Document Type
- Technical Report
- Publication Date
- Jan 09, 1991
- Accession Number
- ADA236047
Entities
People
- Gary P. Petrole
Organizations
- United States Army Command and General Staff College