Responding to Chemical Attack

Abstract

Responding to chemical attack. In view of Iraq's stated intention of using chemical weapons in the Persian Gulf War, the Coalition forces must be prepared to respond. Iraq is capable of conducting such an attack. While the use of chemical weapons may not be militarily significant, the political effect of the use and the response to it may be very significant. Responses including the use of chemical and nuclear weapons are assessed in terms of their legality, political cost, and military effectiveness and found unacceptable. Reliance on diplomatic protests and on post-war criminal sanctions are judged ineffective. A response in the form of increased conventional attack on the Iraqi chemical infrastructure is recommended because that response will preserve the present Coalition, effectively counter the chemical attack, contribute to regional stability, and enhance the reputation of the United States for lawfulness and dependability.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Feb 11, 1991
Accession Number
ADA236609

Entities

People

  • R. W. Bagley Jr

Organizations

  • Naval War College

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Biomedical

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Blood Agents
  • Casualties
  • Chemical Warfare
  • Chemical Warfare Agents
  • Chemical Weapons
  • Classification
  • International Law
  • Nerve Agents
  • Nuclear Weapons
  • Phosgene
  • Security
  • United Nations
  • United States
  • Universities
  • Warfare
  • Weapons
  • Weapons Effects

Readers

  • Military and Counterinsurgency Studies.
  • Political Violence and Terrorism Studies.
  • Strategic Security Studies