The U.S. Army and Ground Combat Theory

Abstract

This monograph examines the role of theory in the development of warfighting concepts and doctrine. It describes the nature and potential importance of theory and provides examples of successful and unsuccessful application of theory in war. The paper examines how doctrine writers have considered classical and contemporary theory in developing U.S. Army doctrine since 1976. It shows that the current writers of the draft FM 100-5, Operations, and the AirLand Battle-Future Umbrella Concept are considering theory in developing their documents. The monograph concludes that the U.S. Army does not have an explicit, contemporary theory of ground combat, even though we use theoretical constructs in developing concepts and doctrine. The paper provides models which demonstrate how we can use theoretical constructs in developing concepts and doctrine. The paper provides models which demonstrate how we can incorporate a theory of ground combat into the TRADOC Concept Based Requirements System (CBRS). The monograph states that the Army should develop an explicit, contemporary, comprehensive theory of ground combat to assist us in forecasting the nature of future wars. Finally, the monograph examines theory within the national context.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Apr 01, 1991
Accession Number
ADA238239

Entities

People

  • Ricky M. Rowlett

Organizations

  • United States Army Command and General Staff College

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Energy and Power Technologies
  • Weapons Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Abstracts
  • Active Defense
  • Air Force
  • Air Power
  • Combat Operations
  • Doctrine
  • Lessons Learned
  • Military History
  • Military Operations
  • Military Organizations
  • Military Strategy
  • National Security
  • Second World War
  • Threats
  • Training
  • United States
  • Warfare

Readers

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Irregular Warfare and Special Operations Cyberspace Operations against Adversarial Threats.
  • Military Science