A Political-Military Game of Protracted Conventional War in Europe

Abstract

In 1987, a group of RAND researchers played a political-military game of protracted conventional war between the NATO and Warsaw Pact countries to take place in 1993. This Note discusses such issues as the prospect that strategic nuclear weapons would signal the strength of the U.S. commitment to NATO and re-establish extended deterrence despite obvious risks of escalation; whether ending a NATO-Warsaw Pact conflict would be difficult to achieve, particularly if either side occupies some part of the Federal Republic of Germany; whether attacking ballistic missile submarines would have any impact on the escalation level of the conflict; and whether waging protracted war in Central Europe is possible under some assumptions. While the results obtained here were clearly a reflection of the particular players and scenarios used, both teams were relatively cautious and conservative in exercising their options, and achieved insights that will be useful to those who conduct political-military games.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Jun 01, 1990
Accession Number
ADA238836

Entities

People

  • John K. Setear

Organizations

  • RAND Corporation

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Counter WMD
  • Ground and Sea Platforms
  • Weapons Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Attrition
  • Ballistic Missile Submarines
  • Ballistic Missiles
  • Central Europe
  • Conventional Warfare
  • Corporations
  • Europe
  • Governments
  • International Relations
  • National Security
  • Nuclear Weapons
  • Strategic Weapons
  • United States
  • Ussr
  • Warfare
  • West Germany
  • Western Europe

Fields of Study

  • History
  • Political science

Readers

  • European Security and Defence Policy (ESDP).
  • Game Theory.
  • Military History / Militaries and War Studies