Fire Planning for Air Assault Operations

Abstract

This is an in-depth analysis of the doctrine, tactics, techniques, and procedures used by forces of the United States Army to plan fires for air assault operations. The conclusions drawn from this study include: A doctrine for fire support does exist, but it is difficult to find and use because it is not found in one place. There is a great difference in opinion of the best way to control the fires of an air assault operation, ie. procedural control vs. positive control. There are great discrepancies in how to conduct fire support for air assault operations, so it is very difficult for the artillery to establish tactics, techniques, and procedures to support air assault operations. There is no standard procedure currently being used, or espoused, by the U.S. Army for fire support in air assault operations. The principal conclusion of this study is that there is a need to adopt standard procedures for fire support for air assault operations. This standard must be incorporated into existing manuals, so a standard procedure for fire support for air assault operations will be used throughout the U.S. Army.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Jun 07, 1991
Accession Number
ADA241454

Entities

People

  • Loyd F. Lawing Jr

Organizations

  • United States Army Command and General Staff College

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Weapons Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Acquisition
  • Air Defense
  • Artillery
  • Attack Helicopters
  • Combat Operations
  • Combat Support
  • Doctrine
  • Fire Support
  • Military Science
  • Military Training
  • Rotary Wing Aircraft
  • Students
  • Target Acquisition
  • Task Forces
  • Training
  • United States
  • Warfare

Readers

  • Fire Suppression Systems Design.
  • Irregular Warfare and Special Operations Cyberspace Operations against Adversarial Threats.
  • Organizational Psychology.