A Taxonomical Structure for Classifying the Goods Purchased by the Federal Government

Abstract

This thesis is an attempt to develop a taxonomical structure to use in the classification of the goods purchased by the Federal Government. The primary objective was to develop a usable scheme that practitioners could employ in classifying goods along a continuum from simple to complex. A secondary objective of this thesis was to determine the characteristics of the goods, other than their obvious physical differences, to utilize in classifying. Using 21 randomly selected heterogeneous goods and a scaling process, a survey was conducted to determine the relationship between these goods and the chosen characteristics. Cluster analysis was then utilized to group the goods into categories that exhibited similar characteristics. As a result of the research, a taxonomical structure for classifying the population of Government goods into five categories was developed. The potential benefits from using such a scheme could arise in the staffing and directing of procurement functions, training and education of the acquisition workforce, and refinement of procurement policy. It is recommended that the taxonomical model resulting from this research be validated and refined through further use.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Dec 01, 1990
Accession Number
ADA242341

Entities

People

  • Brian L. Wenger

Organizations

  • Naval Postgraduate School

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Air Platforms
  • Biomedical
  • Energy and Power Technologies
  • Human Systems
  • Weapons Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Acquisition
  • Business Administration
  • Classification
  • Computers
  • Contracts
  • Environment
  • Government Procurement
  • Governments
  • Information Retrieval
  • Information Science
  • Literature Surveys
  • Organizational Structure
  • Personal Computers
  • Personnel Management
  • Procurement
  • Surveys
  • Three Dimensional

Readers

  • Battery Technology and Engineering
  • Instructional Design and Training Evaluation.
  • Systems Analysis and Design