Operational Art: Practical Utility or Defunct Doctrinal Concept

Abstract

This monograph analyzes the modern doctrinal concept called operational art with regard to its practical utility for operational level commanders and staffs. It uses three campaigns, examined in light of criteria which form the component parts of operational design and the definition of operational art itself. These criteria are: the identification of military strategic goals, the establishment of military conditions, the use of sequential operations, and the allocation of resources. The monograph first establishes a theoretical foundation for the criteria. Next, evidence is drawn from each campaign and is critically analyzed to determine how the current concept of operational art was reflected in the design and conduct of the campaign, and how it contributed to success or failure. The monograph concludes that the modern doctrinal concept called operational art has distinct practical utility. While the mere practice of operational art does not guarantee success, and its component parts do not provide the operational level commander and staff with some kind of magical formula, it does provide them with a critical planning and executing tool.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
May 06, 1991
Accession Number
ADA243340

Entities

People

  • Stephen T. Jordon

Organizations

  • United States Army Command and General Staff College

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • C4I
  • Energy and Power Technologies
  • Human Systems
  • Weapons Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Agreements
  • Battlefields
  • Center Of Gravity
  • Classification
  • Command And Control
  • Contingency Operations (Military)
  • Employment
  • Geographic Regions
  • Geography
  • Gravity
  • Identification
  • Military History
  • Military Operations
  • Military Strategy
  • United States
  • United States Central Command
  • Warfare

Readers

  • Military History / Militaries and War Studies