Life Cycle Costs of the C-130 Electrical Power System Upgrade

Abstract

This research investigated the life cycle costs of three alternative electrical power systems for a planned electrical system upgrade to the C-130 transport aircraft. Research identified the contractors as (1) Sundstrand, (2) Westinghouse, and (3) Leland. The literature review included discussions on the C-130, electrical power systems and the proposed alternatives, and the elements of life cycle cost analysis. In the discussion on supportability issues, this research evaluated changes in mission capable rates and the needed fleet size to perform the current mission. In estimating Operating and Support costs, this research used the analogy approach. Analogies were based on expert opinions of Air Force and industry engineers. Sensitivity analysis was then performed on these expert's predictions to help in the formation of conclusions. The system performance of all options netted similar results. However, Alternative 3 had the lowest total life cycle costs, making it the most cost effective option. This research concluded the Leland proposal to be the best choice and recommends implementation of the proposal.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Sep 01, 1991
Accession Number
ADA246759

Entities

People

  • Theodore D. Seymour

Organizations

  • Air Force Institute of Technology

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Air Platforms
  • Energy and Power Technologies
  • Ground and Sea Platforms
  • Weapons Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Acquisition
  • Air Force
  • Aircrafts
  • Business Administration
  • Cost Analysis
  • Cost Estimates
  • Cost Models
  • Databases
  • Department Of Defense
  • Economic Analysis
  • Failure Mode And Effect Analysis
  • Logistics
  • Maintenance
  • Procurement
  • Reliability
  • Rhode Island
  • United States

Readers

  • Electrical Engineering
  • Life Cycle Cost Analysis