Explaining Success and Failure in Counterinsurgency

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to validate the systems model of insurgency and counterinsurgency by examining two case studies in counterinsurgency; the Emergency in Malaya from 1948-1960 and the ongoing war in El Salvador. One of these case studies proved to be a success, and one thus far has proved to be a failure. The paper's proposition is that successful counterinsurgency, as in Malaya, requires that the government view the insurgency as a system and attack each of the insurgency's components (inputs, conversion process, and outputs). Conversely, unsuccessful cases of counterinsurgency, such is in El Salvador, are those in which the government focuses exclusively on outputs. This study will attempt to validate this proposition by analyzing the conflicts in Malaya and El Salvador in similar terms using the systems model. Insurgency, Counterinsurgency, El Salvador, Malaya, Revolutionary War.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Jun 01, 1991
Accession Number
ADA246957

Entities

People

  • John J. Shea

Organizations

  • Naval Postgraduate School

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Biomedical
  • Energy and Power Technologies
  • Engineered Resilient Systems
  • Weapons Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Central America
  • Civil Defense
  • Contingency Operations (Military)
  • Counterinsurgency
  • El Salvador
  • Governments
  • Health Services
  • Insurgency
  • Military Operations
  • Military Organizations
  • Military Science
  • National Security
  • Psychological Operations
  • Terrorists
  • Urban Areas
  • War Colleges
  • Warfare

Fields of Study

  • History

Readers

  • Computational Modeling and Simulation
  • Military History / Militaries and War Studies
  • Military and Counterinsurgency Studies.