Headless Horsemen or Rodin's Riders--Which will Lead the Military of the Future?

Abstract

Military thinkers have strong pressure on them to consistently be right. These pressure stem from the nature of war itself. Lives are at risk. National treasure can quickly be consumed. Conflicts can escalate through miscalculations. The pressure to maintain an unrealistically high batting average--to always be right--often restricts the ability to generate alternative courses of action appropriate risks. The result is a conservative incremental approach to working issues. B.H. Liddell Hart cautioned against such an approach because, It fosters a cult of soundness, rather than of surprise. It breeds commanders who are so intent not to do anything wrong, according to the book, that they forget the necessity of making the enemy do something wrong. The result is their plans have no result. (36:35) The military has a continuing need for quality thinkers; but the types of thinkers it needs are becoming increasingly short in supply.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
May 01, 1991
Accession Number
ADA247993

Entities

People

  • Paul T. Shorock

Organizations

  • Air War College

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Biomedical
  • Energy and Power Technologies
  • Human Systems
  • Space
  • Weapons Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Air Force
  • Air Force Facilities
  • Cognition
  • Education
  • Governments
  • Marine Corps
  • New York
  • Personality
  • Psychology
  • Reasoning
  • Schools
  • Social Problems
  • Students
  • Thinking
  • United States
  • War Colleges
  • Warfare

Readers

  • Computational Modeling and Simulation
  • Military History of the United States in the 20th Century.
  • Strategic Security Studies