A Call for an Official Naval Doctrine

Abstract

The Navy needs an official doctrine. As the importance of the Maritime Strategy diminishes, the Navy must make fundamental reassessments to incorporate the changes necessary for the 21st century. Although much has been written about doctrine almost none of it is from a naval perspective. This paper analyzes why. It begins by examining Army doctrine and the foundation it provides. By then reviewing the differences inherent in land and sea power, it provides an appreciation for why the Navy approaches doctrine differently. The paper then looks at arguments on both sides of the naval doctrine debate. Finally, the paper points out the expanding role of the Navy in contingency and joint operations and it identifies the need for doctrine to provide a comprehensive way of thinking and fighting to win in those arenas. The paper does not attempt to determine what naval doctrine should be, but only whether it is needed. The paper concludes that despite the enormously difficult challenge, the Navy must develop an official doctrine.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Feb 13, 1992
Accession Number
ADA250339

Entities

People

  • Stephen D. Schmidt

Organizations

  • Naval War College

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Air Platforms
  • Energy and Power Technologies
  • Human Systems
  • Weapons Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Air Force
  • Air Power
  • Combat Areas
  • Contingency Operations (Military)
  • Deterrence
  • Doctrine
  • Military Doctrine
  • Military Organizations
  • Military Science
  • Military Strategy
  • Naval Doctrine
  • Naval Operations
  • Naval Warfare
  • Navy
  • Training
  • War Colleges
  • Warfare

Readers

  • Maritime and Naval Warfare Studies
  • Military History / Militaries and War Studies
  • Systems Analysis and Design