Should Deterrence Fail: War Termination and Campaign Planning

Abstract

Our current operational doctrines display a serious blind spot with regard to the issue of conflict termination. How should the operational commander translate the political or military objectives of a conflict into war termination conditions to be achieved as the product of a campaign? This essay argues that war termination deserves equal billing with other aspects of the campaign planning process and should be guided by a set of principles or guidelines which, like; other dimensions of that process, are best considered earlier rather than later. Based on a review of existing theory and recent historical illustrations, it suggests three requirement which war termination doctrine must address: operational doctrine should tell us something about how to define military conditions in a manner that relates those conditions to strategic aims ; it should facilitate a military contribution to the bargaining process inherent in the terminal phases of a war; and it should help to guide the transition from hostilities back toward a state of peace.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
May 18, 1992
Accession Number
ADA253154

Entities

People

  • James W. Reed

Organizations

  • Naval War College

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Counter WMD
  • Weapons Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Agreements
  • Contingency Operations (Military)
  • Department Of Defense
  • Deterrence
  • Governments
  • Korean War
  • Marine Corps
  • Military Operations
  • Military Strategy
  • Negotiations
  • New York
  • Procurement
  • Security
  • United Nations
  • United States
  • War Colleges
  • Warfare

Readers

  • Military History / Militaries and War Studies