Human Performance Under High G Environments: A Comparison of Upright and Reclined Seat Configurations

Abstract

The present study investigated human cognitive performance under high G in an upright seat and two reclined seats (PALE and Tilt-back). Subjects were required to perform a perceptual/motor and a classification task both separately and concurrently. Data were gathered prior to G-onset, during varying levels of acceleration, and post-G. Results indicated that neither of the reclined seats were superior to the upright seat at high G levels. Perceptual/motor data revealed that the PALE seat has an advantage in post-G recovery, while the upright seat maintains better performance during acceleration for this measure. These results indicate that the physiological benefits of reclination do not easily translate into cognitive performance increments. Before a definitive study can evaluate the contributions reclination may make to pilot performance under severe levels of G-force, engineering issues surrounding the mechanization of reclined seating needs to be resolved

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Oct 15, 1991
Accession Number
ADA259532

Entities

People

  • Edward M. Hitchcock
  • John E. Deaton

Organizations

  • Naval Air Warfare Center Warminster

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Biomedical
  • Human Systems
  • Space

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Aerial Warfare
  • Air Force
  • Aircrafts
  • Computers
  • Engineering
  • Environment
  • Human Factors Engineering
  • Military Organizations
  • Motor Skills
  • Psychomotor Performance
  • Reaction Time
  • Task Performance And Analysis
  • Training
  • Vehicles
  • Warfare

Readers

  • Aviation Science / Aeronautics.
  • Systems Analysis and Design