Why Do We See Three-Dimensional Objects

Abstract

When we look at certain line-drawings, we see three-dimensional objects. The question is why. Why not just see two-dimensional images? Our theory is that we see the objects rather than the images because the objects are simpler than the images. We define the complexity of an object as the number of bits in a pose-independent, binary representation of that object. We examine a number of examples and find that in each case the seen object is indeed simpler than the given image. This leads us to our second question. Given that we are going to see a three-dimensional object when we look at a line-drawing, which three-dimensional object will we see? Our theory is that the vision system will pick the simplest object from among the infinite set of possibilities. We examine a number of examples and find that in each case the data is consistent with the theory. This work is based on the pioneering ideas of Solomonoff and Kolmogorov, and on the more recent minimum description length concepts of Rissanen.... Vision, Three-dimensional, Perception.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Jun 01, 1992
Accession Number
ADA259892

Entities

People

  • Thomas Marill

Organizations

  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Air Platforms
  • Energy and Power Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Abstracts
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Coding
  • Computer Programming
  • Computer Vision
  • Coordinate Systems
  • Decoding
  • Dictionaries
  • Distortion
  • Images
  • Information Theory
  • Military Research
  • Perception
  • Probability
  • Standards
  • Three Dimensional
  • Two Dimensional

Readers

  • Applied Combinatorial Optimization and Logic Circuit Design.
  • Calculus or Mathematical Analysis
  • Computer Vision.