Test Technology Development, Military Standards I

Abstract

The Military Standards Phase I methodology project was established to investigate the disparities observed during the evaluation of draft technical manuals (DTMs) at USAEPG. The objective of the investigation was to develop a concise and effective method with which to prepare and evaluate technical publications within TECOM and the Army. It was found that the numerous standards available to prepare DTMs contain repetitive requirements. These requirements were found to be either exactly the same or titled the same but contained differing (negating) instructions. The investigation collected and categorized these deficiencies to substantiate the recommendation to revise present DTM preparation and evaluation processes. The final analysis documents the need to not only standardize the 'specifications' but to eliminate manual methods of evaluating DTM requirements such as grammar, format, style, and readability, replacing this with the commercial off-the-shelf software programs. In addition, it is recommended that an expert system'process' be investigated in the second phase of this project to eliminate skewed evaluation results and assist the preparers of DTM contracts and manuals at the development stage. The hope is that this method will eliminate shortfalls with a primary resource (technical publication) of a system and prevent operational mission failures

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Mar 31, 1993
Accession Number
ADA264814

Entities

People

  • Joann Robinson

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Biomedical
  • Cyber
  • Human Systems
  • Weapons Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Computer Programs
  • Contracts
  • Corrosion Inhibition
  • Expert Systems
  • Instructions
  • Logistics
  • Maintenance
  • Maintenance Management
  • Maintenance Personnel
  • Military Standards
  • Security
  • Standards
  • Task Performance And Analysis
  • Test And Evaluation
  • Test Equipment
  • United States

Readers

  • Aerospace Test and Evaluation
  • Instructional Design and Training Evaluation.
  • Library and Information Science