Visual Psychophysics of Egomotion

Abstract

One study investigated, under two viewing conditions, an observer's ability to determine whether s/he was moving forward along a straight or curved path using simulations of optic flow patterns. In one condition, the retinal image was stabilized against the effects of eye movements, in the other condition, eye movements were unrestricted. Stabilizing the retinal image decreased performance at slow speeds. A second study further explored the role of eye movements in the perception of motion. Speed-difference thresholds were measured under conditions of stabilized and free-viewing conditions. Despite the fact that eye movements can alter the direction and speed of the retinal-image motion relative to the stimulus motion, observers were able to judge speed differences in the free-viewing condition as well as in the stabilized-viewing condition, with the exception of the slowest speed. At the slowest speed, observers were able to detect smaller speed differences in the free-viewing condition. A third study determined the optimal stimulus for motion detection by searching the spatiotemporal stimulus whose direction was identified with least contrast energy. The best stimulus was determined to be at 3 cycles/deg,1.67 deg/s with bandwidths of 7.06 Hz and 1 - 0.5 octaves.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Mar 02, 1993
Accession Number
ADA265253

Entities

People

  • Kathleen Turano

Organizations

  • Johns Hopkins University

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Energy and Power Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Comparators
  • Contrast
  • Detection
  • Discrimination
  • Eye
  • Eye Movements
  • Frequency
  • Frequency Domain
  • Observers
  • Perception
  • Scanning
  • Simulations
  • Sine Waves
  • Three Dimensional
  • Two Dimensional
  • Visual Perception

Fields of Study

  • Psychology

Readers

  • Control Systems Engineering.
  • Vision Science/Vision Psychology/Cognitive Neuroscience.