Baghdad, or Bust

Abstract

The paper compares the decision to terminate "Operation Desert Storm" against the strategic aims articulated in United Nations Resolutions 660-678. It argues that continuing beyond the termination point would have taken the United States beyond the culminating point of victory. It compares the outcome against two hypothetical sequels that many propose would have established a longer- lasting peace. It analyzes the political cost and the military capability to continue fighting against the potential gains. It argues that strict adherence to the "Weinberger Doctrine" limits the ability to justify an escalation of war aims if a nation or coalition has reached them before it reaches the culminating point of victory.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Jun 18, 1993
Accession Number
ADA266795

Entities

People

  • Patrick W. Blazek

Organizations

  • Naval War College

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Counter WMD
  • Energy and Power Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Contingency Operations (Military)
  • Governments
  • International Law
  • International Relations
  • Joint Military Activities
  • Law
  • Military Capabilities
  • National Security
  • Saudi Arabia
  • Security
  • Terrorists
  • United Nations
  • United States
  • Ussr
  • War
  • War Colleges
  • Warfare

Readers

  • Economics
  • Military History / Militaries and War Studies