Comparative Cost and Support Pattern Analysis for High Demand Navy Customers Under a Single Site Storage Option

Abstract

This report details results of a comparative cost analysis conducted to assess the relative cost differences due to single siting of stock at selected DLA and Navy storage sites. Additionally, all vendor and customer service patterns, which would result from single siting of stock, were identified. These patterns were identified in order to provide insight on the resulting business distributions which would need to be supported from each site. This study has included actual Navy retail level data in addition to DoD wholesale data. Inclusion of retail data has had a significant impact on study results. A major constraint on the study is that capacity limits at the selected storage sites were not considered. Study results indicate that the two largest Navy support areas (Norfolk and San Diego) offer significant potential for materiel distribution savings since those two locations have both a large local (within 50 miles) customer base and are well positioned with respect to vendor locations. Materiel distribution costs, Navy and DLA demands, Customer patterns, Vendor patterns, Wholesale and retail, Fleet support, Single site storage.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Jul 01, 1993
Accession Number
ADA270388

Entities

People

  • Charles R. Noli
  • Thomas P. Lanagan

Organizations

  • Defense Logistics Agency

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • C4I
  • Ground and Sea Platforms
  • Human Systems
  • Materials and Manufacturing Processes

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Air Force
  • Aircrafts
  • Base Closures
  • Commerce
  • Cost Analysis
  • Customer Services
  • Department Of Defense
  • Economic Analysis
  • Geographic Regions
  • Inclusions
  • Logistics
  • Operations Research
  • Packaging
  • Plastic Explosives
  • Procurement
  • Standards
  • Two Dimensional

Readers

  • Economics
  • Environmental Remediation and Restoration.
  • Life Cycle Cost Analysis