Environmental Impact Statement for Proposed Closure of Eaker Air Force Base, Arkansas

Abstract

During the late summer of 1989, the Air Force began a thorough review of its force structure, property, and facility requirements needed to support national security policy and future fiscal realities. As a result of this review process, the Secretary of Defense, on 29 January 1990, announced his proposal to close or realign a number of military bases. Eaker AFB, Arkansas, has been identified as a candidate for closure by late 1993. Prior to closure decisions, studies of strategic, operational, budgetary, fiscal, environmental, and local economic consequences are required under Title 10 USC 2687. In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the results of the environmental study are described in this DEIS, which includes analyses of community setting, land use and aesthetics, transportation, utilities, hazardous materials, geology and soils, water resources, air quality, noise, biological resources, and cultural and paleontological resources. Alternatives to closure of Eaker AFB analyzed in this DEIS include closure of Wurtsmith AFB, Michigan, and no action. If a decision is made to close either Eaker AFB or Wurtsmith AFB, a second EIS will be prepared to cover the final disposition/reuse of the excess property. After base closure, but prior to final decisions on reuse, a caretaker force would be established to provide maintenance of buildings, grounds, and essential utility systems, and to restrict access to the base.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
May 01, 1990
Accession Number
ADA270605

Entities

Organizations

  • United States Department of the Air Force

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Air Platforms
  • Biomedical
  • Human Systems
  • Weapons Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Air Force
  • Birds
  • Chemical Synthesis
  • Chemistry
  • Civil Engineering
  • Employment
  • Environmental Protection
  • Geography
  • Habitats
  • Health Services
  • Land Transportation
  • Materials Laboratories
  • Materials Science
  • Medical Personnel
  • National Security
  • Wildlife

Readers

  • Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) of Proposed Air Force Base Actions.