Armor Lieutenant Colonel Promotion Predictors

Abstract

This study examines the FYs 1990-1992 Lieutenant Colonel Promotion Selection Board results to identify and rank-order predictors associated with selection and nonselection of armor majors for promotion to lieutenant colonel. The study revealed 13 predictors associated with selection and 10 predictors associated with nonselection to lieutenant colonel that met the .05 level of significance. These predictors were based on sanitized officer record brief data for the majors considered in the primary zone. The study compares the predictors with established Army policy contained in DA PAM 600-3, and the Secretary of the Army's Selection Board instructions in force during FYs 1990-1992. The study found that the board results complied with Army policy in force during this period. This study also found that service as an operations officer (S3) or executive officer (XO) and a MEL 4 (military education level) education are requirements for promotion to lieutenant colonel. However, since promotion boards are not required to strictly follow the requirements in DA PAM 600-3, the study recommends that it be used as a vehicle to honestly articulate selection board requirements to officers in the field. DA PAM 600-3, Armor lieutenant colonel promotions, Branch qualification, Field grade promotions.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Jun 04, 1993
Accession Number
ADA272881

Entities

People

  • R. B. Haverty

Organizations

  • United States Army Command and General Staff College

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Biomedical
  • Human Systems

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Army Personnel
  • Computer Programs
  • Education
  • Instructions
  • Instructors
  • Military Education
  • Military Science
  • Officer Personnel
  • Personnel Management
  • Professional Development
  • Social Sciences
  • Statistical Analysis
  • Students
  • Training
  • United States
  • War Colleges
  • Warfare

Readers

  • Military History of the United States in the 20th Century.
  • Military Training and Readiness Simulation
  • Psychometric Testing or Psychological Assessment.