A Comparison of Military and Commercial Aircraft Development

Abstract

When compared to the commercial sector, it takes the military almost four times longer to develop an aircraft. For example, Boeing Company developed the 767 jetliner in about four years whereas the Navy's next generation tactical aircraft, the AX, is expected to take 15 years to develop. This research paper examines both commercial and military approaches to aircraft development. The paper focuses on establishing whether or not commercial practices, where more cost effective, can be incorporated into the military acquisition system. The paper illustrates that aircraft development in the commercial and military are different for two fundamental reasons. First. military aircraft development exploits the latest untested developments in technology where the commercial sector relies only on existing technologies. Second, a commercial aircraft is developed for the single mission of ferrying passengers and cargo. Military aircraft are required to perform far more varied and different missions with each parameter driving its own unique challenge for design and testing. This research paper concludes that without similar mission requirements, there are few commercial applications that can be applied to military aircraft development.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Apr 01, 1993
Accession Number
ADA276830

Entities

People

  • Michael S. Mutty

Organizations

  • Dwight D. Eisenhower School for National Security and Resource Strategy

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Air Platforms

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Airborne Warning And Control System
  • Aircraft Industry
  • Aircrafts
  • Airframes
  • Attack Aircraft
  • Cargo Aircraft
  • Commercial Aircraft
  • Contracts
  • Department Of Defense
  • Government Procurement
  • Governments
  • Manufacturing
  • Military Acquisition
  • Military Aircraft
  • Passenger Aircraft
  • Personnel Management
  • Transport Aircraft

Readers

  • Aerospace logistics and air mobility.
  • Economics
  • Systems Analysis and Design