The New U.S. Strategic Debate

Abstract

This RAND report examines the emerging debate in the United States over post-Cold War national security strategy. It discusses the ideas now clashing and competing for preeminence as our leaders seek to forge a new post- Cold War national security consensus in a changing domestic context. For the past four decades, the United States has enjoyed a bipartisan consensus in national security strategy. That consensus is now eroding as politicians and diplomats, strategists and defense planners, and scholars and the general public grapple with the meaning of the end of the Cold War. In its place a burgeoning debate is emerging about the nature of the post-Cold War world and the desired American role in it. Against this background, strategists and defense planners need, more than ever before, to be cognizant of the domestic pressures reshaping elite and public thinking. This essay should be read as a contribution to a better understanding of these factors.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Jan 01, 1994
Accession Number
ADA282501

Entities

People

  • Ronald D. Asmus

Organizations

  • RAND Corporation

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Biomedical
  • Counter WMD
  • Energy and Power Technologies
  • Space

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Congress
  • Contingency Operations (Military)
  • Economic Warfare
  • Foreign Relations
  • Geography
  • Globalization
  • Intergovernmental Organizations
  • International Law
  • International Organizations
  • International Relations
  • Investments
  • National Politics
  • National Security
  • Public Policy
  • Recreation
  • Treaties

Fields of Study

  • Political science

Readers

  • Military History of the United States in the 20th Century.
  • Strategic Security Studies