Learning Styles of Government and Industry Negotiators: An Analysis

Abstract

This research sought to identify and compare the predominant learning styles of Government versus Industry negotiators using the Kolb Learning Style Inventory. Additionally it sought to identify and analyze differences and similarities between Government Procuring Contracting Officers (PCOS) and Administrative Contracting Officers (ACOs), Government versus Industry negotiators, and by variances due to educational background. The Kolb Learning Style Inventory is a self descriptive questionnaire designed to measure individual emphasis on four learning abilities: concrete experience (CE), reflective observation (RO), abstract conceptualization (AC), and active experimentation (AE). A total of 473 Government and 153 Industry contract negotiators responded to a survey which was designed to allow analysis based on age, education, experience, and negotiation authority. Results for Government and Industry were presented separately, then compared. Based upon these analyses, it was concluded that Government PCOs are Convergers (favor CE and AE) , ACOs are Accommodators (favor CE and AE), and Industry negotiators are Assimilators (favor AC and RO). As education, experience, age, and negotiation authority increase so do preferences for active (AE) and abstract (AC) learning traits.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Jun 01, 1994
Accession Number
ADA282771

Entities

People

  • John A. Hayward

Organizations

  • Naval Postgraduate School

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Biomedical

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Acquisition
  • Age Groups
  • Capillary Electrophoresis
  • Concrete
  • Contract Administration
  • Contracts
  • Demography
  • Education
  • Employment
  • Governments
  • Negotiations
  • Observation
  • Political Science
  • Psychology
  • Reasoning
  • Students
  • United States

Readers

  • Government Contracting/Procurement.
  • Military Leadership and Professional Education.
  • Organizational Psychology.