Let's Put Joint Back into JFACC

Abstract

The Joint Force Air Component Commander (JFACC) concept remains a very controversial subject. A survey of the doctrinal differences among Services highlights the origins of some very contentious issues. U. S. Air Force doctrine places heavy emphasis on the strategic use of airpower. Existing or evolving doctrine in the U. S. Army, U. S. Navy, and U. S. Marine Corps lean more-to the tactical use of aviation assets. The JFACC process must be responsive to the needs of all Services in the joint arena. The interdependence of joint forces demands a JFACC staff that is sensitive to the needs of all participants. In essence, it must act in a more 'purple', fashion. A standing all Services JFACC staff is a realistic and feasible means to achieve this end. The Joint Warfighting Center, USACOM, and initiatives at USCINCLANT/USCINCPAC are offered as possible avenues for achieving this goal. In this manner, the Joint Task Force Commander will increase the likelihood that the aerospace needs of future forces are met most effectively and efficiently. THE JFACC should be manned by all services.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
May 16, 1994
Accession Number
ADA283537

Entities

People

  • Lynn M. Champagne

Organizations

  • Naval War College

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • C4I
  • Space
  • Weapons Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Air Defense
  • Air Force
  • Air Power
  • Close Support
  • Command And Control
  • Contingency Operations (Military)
  • Employment
  • Fixed Wing Aircraft
  • Interdiction
  • Military Aircraft
  • Military History
  • Military Operations
  • Tactical Air Support
  • Task Forces
  • United States
  • War Colleges
  • Warfare

Readers

  • Joint Military Operations and Doctrine.
  • Maritime Combat Support and Expeditionary Logistics.

Technology Areas

  • Space